Please Support My Writing
If you want to see more of this kind of content, please support me by buying my books (click here: Amazon). If you write a review of one of my books, please let me know, and I'll link to it. Thanks!- Follow Jim's Jumbler on WordPress.com
-
Recent Posts
Pages
- About Jim’s Jumbler
- Ayn Rand’s Anthem in Modern English
- Dracula in Modern English
- Frankenstein in Modern English
- Movie and Series Reviews (Alphabetically)
- Paradise Lost in Modern English
- The Dunwich Horror in Modern English
- The Gnostic Genesis: Hypostasis of the Archons
- The Mabinogion in Modern English
- The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner
- The Shunned House in Modern English
Archives
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- August 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- December 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- May 2011
- March 2011
- October 2010
Categories
Recent Comments
Meta
Tag Archives: the non aggression principle
An Ethical Rebuttal of Libertarianism?
The article “Why I left libertarianism: An ethical critique of a limited ideology” contains what the author, Will Moyer, specifically calls an ethical rebuttal of the philosophy. I recommend reading the whole article. I’m going to examine only his rebuttal. … Continue reading
Posted in philosophy
Tagged lubertarianism, morality, property rights, rebuttal, the non aggression principle
Leave a comment
Sophistry for God: William Lane Craig
I’m going to step back and analyze Willian Lane Craig’s opening statement from his debate with Sam Harris on “Is the Foundation of Morality Natural or Supernatural?”. Again, I’ll summarize his argument, hopefully without too much distortion, commenting as I … Continue reading
Posted in philosophy
Tagged anselm of canterbury, christianity, consciousness, cousin marriage, determinism, evolution, gospel of q, morality, naturalism, omnibenevolence, omniscience, sam harris, sophistry, stefan molyneux, the non aggression principle, universally preferable behaviour, willian craig
Leave a comment
Debunking “UPB – Debunked”
The video Universally Preferable Behavior – Debunked by Josh Cardosi claims to debunk Stefan Molyneux’s theory of UPB. While he makes a solid point about Stefan’s blindness to the fact that his (and my) belief in the value of morals is … Continue reading
Universally Preferable Behaviour in a Nutshell
I’m going to attempt to give a concise summary of Stefan Molyneux’s theory of Universally Preferable Behavior. First, the axioms: Morality is a valid concept. Moral rules are consistent for all mankind. Moral theory is self consistent. Moral theory is … Continue reading
